Author: tfwee
September 2007
New data for the month,
- 18-Sep-07 (mkt close) : MacCookPSF (Q108 – Sep07) – DPU A2.625ct
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPH |
FY06 – Aug |
24.0 |
S$4.32 |
5.556% |
16.00 |
Interim 7ct ; Final 8ct + 9ct (Special) |
|
SingPost |
FY07 : Mar |
6.25 |
S$1.22 |
5.123% |
16.74 |
Q1 1.25ct ; Q2 1.25ct ; Q3 1.25ct ; Q4 2.5ct |
|
Sing Food |
FY06 : Dec |
5.4 |
S$0.81 |
6.667% |
13.73 |
Interim 2.2ct ; Final 3.2ct |
|
STEng |
FY06 : Dec |
15.11 |
S$3.90 |
3.874% |
25.74 |
Final 4ct + 11.11ct (Special) |
Note : STEng will be removed from table next month as Yield has dropped below my target 4%
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBSTransit |
FY06 : Dec |
28.5 |
S$3.06 |
9.314% |
16.56 |
Interim 5ct ; Final 6.5ct + Special 17ct |
|
ComfortDelgro |
FY06 : Dec |
11.0 |
S$1.94 |
5.670% |
16.44 |
Interim 3.125ct + Special 3.375 ; Final 3ct + Special 1.5ct |
|
SMRT |
FY07 : Mar |
7.25 |
S$1.71 |
4.240% |
19.21 |
Interim 1.5ct ; Final 5.75ct |
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SingTel |
FY07 : Mar |
20.6 |
S$4.02 |
5.124% |
17.29 |
Interim 4.6ct ; Final 6.5ct + Special 9.5ct |
|
M1 |
FY06 : Dec |
13.3 |
S$2.05 |
6.488% |
12.35 |
Interim 5.8ct ; Final 7.5ct |
|
StarHub |
FY06 : Dec |
11.5 |
S$3.10 |
3.710% |
17.61 |
Q1 2.5ct ; Q2 2.5ct ; Q3 3ct ; Q4 3.5ct |
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
NAV |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPAus |
2H : Mar-07 |
7.0846 |
S$1.66 |
8.536% |
– |
1H A5.4841ct @ 1.2105 ; 2H A5.4766 @ 1.2936 |
|
MIIF |
1H : Jun-07 |
4.15 |
S$1.10 |
7.545% |
$1.19 |
1H 4.15ct |
|
MacCookPSF |
Q4 : Jun-07 |
2.61877 |
S$1.34 |
7.817% |
A$1.06 |
Q307 A2.375ct @ 1.2614 ; Q407 A2.375ct @ 1.3103 |
* SPAus and MacCookPSF DPU in A$. Yield is thus also Dependent on Exchange Rate
NOTES :
- Mkt Price is as on 28-Sep-07
- MacCookPSF : Q108 (Sep07) – A2.625ct
- ComfortDelgro : Q207 – Interim 3.35ct + Special 4.15ct
- SBSTransit : Q207 – Interim 6ct
- MIIF : 1H07 – 4.15ct
- ST Engg : Q207 – 2ct
- StarHub : Q207 – 4ct ; Q107 – 3.5ct
- SingPost : Q108 (Jun) – 1.25ct
- M1 : 1H07 (Jun) – Interim 2.5ct + Capital Reduction 4.6ct
- SPAus : 2H07 (Mar07) – A5.4766ct @ 1.2936 ; 1H07 (Sep06) – A5.4841ct @ 1.2105
- SingTel : Q407 (Mar07) – Final 6.5ct + Special 9.5ct ; Q207 (Sep06) – Interim 4.6ct
- SMRT : Q407 (Mar07) – Final 5.75ct ; Q207 (Sep06) – Interim 1.5ct
- SPH : 1H07 (Feb07) – Interim 7ct
SPH – SGX
The Board of Directors of Eastern Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) wishes to announce that its subsidiary Eastern Directories Pte Ltd (“EDPL”) has signed a non-binding Letter Of Intent (“LOI”) with Singapore Press Holdings Limited (“SPH”) to dispose of selected media assets.
EDPL plans to divest the following four events and related assets:
1. the IT Show;
2. the Computer Exhibition (“COMEX”);
3. the Food and Beverage Fair; and
4. the World Food Fair.
The above transaction is subject to satisfactory due diligence by SPH, negotiation of final terms and approval from the shareholders of the Company at an Extraordinary General Meeting which will be convened after the signing if successful of the Sales & Purchase Agreement.
Source : SGX
SPAus – BT
SP AusNet to buy assets from Singapore Power for A$8.14b
(SYDNEY) SP AusNet has agreed to buy assets from parent Singapore Power Ltd for A$8.14 billion (S$10.4 billion), including debt, to become Australia’s largest energy transmission company.
The acquisition will be funded by a mix of debt and equity, Melbourne-based SP AusNet said yesterday in a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange. It will pay the same price, plus unspecified transaction costs, for the Alinta Ltd assets that Singapore Power did when it, together with Babcock & Brown Ltd, bought the Western Australian utility earlier this month.
Singapore Power said in May it would offer its share of Perth-based Alinta to its Australian unit, allowing it to benefit from energy demand forecast to rise by 2 per cent a year till 2011. Since then, a credit crisis increased the cost of borrowing, while a regulator in SP AusNet’s home state of Victoria proposed bigger- than-expected cuts in gas network charges.
‘Circumstances have changed since the parent company agreed to buy these assets,’ said Paul Johnston, a utilities analyst at Commonwealth Securities Ltd in Melbourne.
‘They are quality assets and it is a great opportunity to increase their size, but I’m just doubting the price and the value they’re actually going to get.’ SP AusNet fell five Australian cents, or 3.6 per cent, to A$1.34 in Sydney trading, lagging a 0.1 per cent decline in the exchange’s benchmark utilities index.
SP AusNet will get gas and electricity distribution networks in New South Wales and Victoria states, two natural gas pipelines and an energy asset management unit in eastern Australia. It did not split the purchase price between equity and assumed debt, or quantify the transaction costs.
Chief financial officer Geoff Nicholson declined on a conference call to estimate the effect of the purchase on cash flows, quantify savings from merging the assets, or the size of the share sale and debt raising that will be required.
SP AusNet agreed on Wednesday night with Singapore Power on the transaction and needed to release a statement even though financial details are not yet available, he said.
The lack of financial information prompted criticism on the call from analysts including David Leitch at UBS AG and Matthew Spence at Merrill Lynch & Co. ‘I have to regard this as one of the most useless announcements I’ve ever come across,’ Mr Leitch said on the call. ‘What on earth are analysts supposed to make of it? You’ve said you’re going to have to raise a lot more equity without explaining in any financial sense how it’s going to benefit security holders.’
Singapore Power intends to buy shares in the equity raising to keep a 51 per cent stake in SP AusNet, the Australian company said. The purchase needs to be approved by SP AusNet shareholders at a meeting targeted for late this year.
SP AusNet maintained a forecast increase of about 2.5 per cent in the full-year dividend in the year ending March 31.
‘These assets provide a strong fit with our existing portfolio of energy transmission and distribution assets,’ Nino Ficca, managing director of SP AusNet, said in the statement. ‘The opportunity to expand our operations outside the geographic boundaries of Victoria, as well as into the area of gas transmission, is something that we have been working on for some time.’ – Bloomberg
SPAusNet – BT
SP Ausnet to buy Alinta assets for A$8b
SYDNEY – Australian infrastructure firm SP Ausnet said on Thursday it has agreed with Singapore Power to buy some assets of energy firm Alinta for A$8.142 billion (US$6.96 billion).
SP Ausnet, which owns and operates electricity and gas transmission networks in Victoria state, said the acquisition will be funded by a mixture of debt and equity, including a rights issue to security holders.
SP Ausnet reaffirmed its full year distribution guidance for 2007/2008 and said the acquisition of Alinta assets, which include a gas distribution network in the state of New South Wales and a electricity network in Victoria state, would make it one of the largest infrastructure businesses in Australia.
Analysts said the acquisition was too expensive and would dilute SP Ausnet’s value as well as jeopardise the firm’s distribution yield.
‘A rights issue would need to be done at a steep discount given the Alinta deal is dilutive, the size of the rights issue and SP Ausnet’s lacklustre performance since listing in 2005,’ said Merrill Lynch analyst Matthew Spence.
Alinta, previously Australia’s largest energy infrastructure firm, was acquired and carved up by a consortium of investment firm Babcock & Brown Ltd and state-owned utility Singapore Power.
‘The opportunity to expand our operations outside the geographic boundaries of Victoria, as well as into the area of gas transmission, is something that we have been working on for some time,’ SP Ausnet Managing Director Nino Ficca said in a statement.
The company said the purchase of gas and electricity transmission assets in New South Wales and Queensland would also position it for possible future privatisation of the two states’ energy infrastructure.
Singapore Power owns 51 per cent of SP Ausnet, which was listed in Australia and Singapore in December 2005.
Analysts have raised concerns about the impact on SP Ausnet’s share price and dividends if it bought Alinta assets, given the high price Babcock and Singapore Power paid in their A$8 billion takeover.
Investment banks UBS AG and Morgan Stanley, which will be managing the rights issue, will underwrite the balance of A$1 billion to fund the transaction, the paper said.
SP Ausnet declined to give any financial forecasts for the transaction during a briefing, saying that a detailed report would be issued later this year. SP Ausnet said the acquisition was subject to security holders’ approval. The company plans to hold a meeting with security holders before the end of the year. — REUTERS
MIIF – BT
Ask Macquarie some tough questions
THE managers and directors of Macquarie International Infrastructure Fund (MIIF) will have to tread cautiously in the next few months.
Their recent decisions to sell a substantial portion of the fund’s portfolio to other parts of the Macquarie Bank group merit close scrutiny by the fund’s shareholders and the wider investing public.
The most obvious questions that shareholders in the fund need to ask the managers and directors are: Would the assets fetch a higher price if they were sold to a buyer outside the group? Has the fund tried to sell the assets to other buyers? If not, why not?
Earlier this week, MIIF said it had agreed to sell its German oil and chemicals storage business for some 89 million euros (S$187.3 million) to another Macquarie fund, the LODH Macquarie Infrastructure Fund.
And last month, MIIF said it would sell its 3.2 per cent stake in Brussels Airport for some 52.8 million euros to Macquarie Airports Ltd, which is also managed by a wholly owned subsidiary of Macquarie Bank.
Together, the two assets comprise about 16 per cent of MIIF’s portfolio by value as at June 30.
MIIF has said it would meet its shareholders to seek their approval for both sales in November. Shareholders should ask their questions then, if not before.
In the case of the sale of the German asset, MIIF has also said that its audit committee is ‘obtaining an opinion from an independent financial adviser confirming whether the proposed transaction is on normal commercial terms and not prejudicial to MIIF and its minority shareholders’.
It must go further. The board should publish not just a summary of the independent financial adviser’s findings, but details of how it arrived at its recommendations, including the method used for determining the value of the assets. It should also address the question of whether the asset being sold would fetch a higher price in other hands.
This may seem a heavy burden, but it is the price for taking money from retail investors.
Investment vehicles listing on the stock exchange here are becoming increasingly complex, both in their legal structure and their target investments. Many, like MIIF, have large parent groups and are domiciled offshore – in Bermuda, for example.
The often remote nature of the assets they invest in, and the fact that many of the transactions take place between interested parties means that small shareholders in these vehicles must rely heavily on the recommendations of their independent directors to safeguard their interests.
By their very nature, these investment vehicles – ranging from simple property trusts to funds that invest in exotic structured financial assets – are riddled with potential conflicts of interest, as they often start out at the time of listing by raising money from outside investors to buy assets spun off from their parent group. In return, they offer ordinary people the chance to invest in assets that are not typically within easy reach.
The proposed asset sales by MIIF – and the unhappiness of some of its shareholders over the transaction terms – is a useful reminder of the potential conflicts of interest that are inherent in such investment structures.
Such conflicts of interest are difficult to avoid, but it is right that they should be subjected to robust examination by shareholders whenever they arise.
One suggestion that has been made is for MIIF to put the assets up for auction and to hire an independent party to manage the sales.
A close reading of MIIF’s listing prospectus suggests that the burden of ensuring that such transactions are conducted properly falls to its audit and risk committee, which comprises three independent directors and is chaired by Heng Chiang Meng, who also sits on the board of property developer Keppel Land. Among other things, the document states that ‘only MIIF’s independent directors will make decisions about transactions which involve Macquarie Bank group entities as counterparties’.
Shareholders should therefore hold MIIF’s board – particularly its independent directors – responsible for the decisions they make on these transactions.