TELCOs – BT
Telcos and the BPL’s moving goalposts
THE next cycle of bidding for the Barclays Premier League will be for the 2013- 2016 period. That is some ways off, which is a good thing. Analysts will need all the time they get to figure out who needs the BPL broadcast rights more: StarHub or SingTel?
What used to be so clear – that whoever exclusively carries the BPL is broadcasting king – is now more of a conundrum, thanks to the cross-carriage law.
Now, StarHub and SingTel will be more preoccupied with not ending up the court jester instead. With the cross-carriage law, whoever clinches the ‘exclusive’ rights will have to let its competitor air the matches for its own viewers.
This is good news for football fans, but it makes analysts wish for the good old days when SingTel had simply paid a large chunk of change for the 2010-2013 package of truly exclusive BPL rights.
Then, the moaning had been fairly straightforward – the bidding war over the BPL rights led to the Fifa World Cup people holding both operators hostage for World Cup 2010. Consequently, viewers paid about 4.5 times more to watch the World Cup in 2010 than in 2006. Everyone (especially those who bet against Spain) was unhappy.
Similarly, analysis had been relatively simple. Football fans swelled the ranks of SingTel’s mio TV subscriber base, which currently stands at about 335,000, up from 155,000 at the end of 2009. BPL had become a feather in mio TV’s cap and a thorn in StarHub’s side.
Now, both operators have their own reasons for not wanting to bid each other out of the BPL park; both will be able to offer it to their own viewers, whether or not they get the rights.
SingTel, chastened by its last BPL splash-out, might want to be seen exercising some restraint. StarHub, with almost 550,000 subscribers who will get the BPL in any case, does not need to fear attrition.
In one way, the cross-carriage law would have fulfilled its objective of trying to keep content costs under control.
But however tidy policy is, life is messier. So, StarHub and SingTel also have equally compelling reasons to have another bidding slap-fight.
‘It’s actually quite difficult to rate the impact on the whole thing,’ Nomura analyst Sachin Gupta told BT. ‘Either telco could pay over the top as the potential customers could increase a lot without much incremental cost (it can access customers across both platforms). But at the same time, the scope to win the customer outright could diminish a fair bit too.’
Anyone looking for clues in the recent Euro 2012 broadcast deal that StarHub won the rights to will be disappointed. Unlike the three-year BPL deal, it is a one-off event and SingTel’s lack of enthusiasm is no indicator of how it feels about the BPL. In Kardashian terms, Euro 2012 is the Khloe to BPL’s Kim.
SingTel, however, might have more to brace itself against. If one hazards a guess that a fair number of mio TV subscribers signed up just for the BPL while hanging on to the StarHub account to placate the missus, a lot might pivot on what they will do after 2013, when they can watch the BPL on StarHub as well.
Some attrition might be inevitable, regardless of whether SingTel clinches the 2013-2016 BPL rights.
SingTel’s solution, then, might come from outside football. ‘SingTel still needs a unique selling point, and (BPL) is the only USP. They don’t have the movie content nor the documentaries,’ an analyst with a local house told BT.
The cross-carriage law might work in SingTel’s favour, as it is already reshaping the way operators negotiate other types of content. Earlier this year, StarHub renewed its deal with Fox International Channels on a non-exclusive basis, leaving it open for the first time to other players such as SingTel.
While BT understands that SingTel might not have found Fox’s asking price to its liking, it could still go on to bid for other programmes as more non-exclusive deals are drawn up by its competitor.
With its current BPL dominance winding down in 2013, there is still time to beef up its portfolio. Similarly, local men will have enough time to find a real hobby. One that involves being outdoors.
SPH – BT
Boon Yang to balance both chairman posts
NEWLY appointed Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) chairman Lee Boon Yang has assured shareholders he will devote sufficient time and attention to steer the media group through the challenging times ahead.
He was addressing the concern raised by a shareholder at the annual general meeting yesterday on how he would balance his time as chairman of both SPH and Keppel Corp.
Dr Lee, who was minister for information, communications and the arts before he retired from politics in March 2009, was appointed an SPH director in October. He said he had given deep thought to the invitation to join the SPH board before accepting it.
‘I believe that I will be able to manage my time so that I can provide SPH with sufficient time and attention in order to see SPH continue to do well in this very competitive and challenging period,’ he added.
‘If I had not come to the conclusion that I would be able to manage my time to do a decent and good job for SPH, I would not have accepted the invitation.’
His assurance was met with strong support from shareholders, with 99.85 per cent of those who voted at the AGM voting in favour of his re-election as a director of SPH.
SPH conducted poll voting in its AGM for the first time yesterday and all other resolutions were duly passed. Former chief justice Yong Pung How did not stand for re-election and stepped down from the board.
Most shareholders told BT that they have no issues with Dr Lee being chairman of two large listed companies. One 30-year-old shareholder, who gave his name as Mr Tiah, was more ambivalent. ‘I guess he would be professional enough to consider that he needs to split his time between two large companies in Singapore,’ he said.
A couple of queries on dividend payouts were also raised at the AGM. Stephen Chen, an investment manager at Chen Holdings, asked if the current dividend payout ratio was sustainable. SPH acting chairman Cham Tao Soon explained that while the current dividend payout is almost 95 per cent of recurring earnings, future payouts will depend on how SPH fares and the state of the economy.
Addressing a query on an $11 million share of net loss from jointly controlled entities in fiscal 2011, SPH chief financial officer Tony Mallek said these entities are mainly overseas online ventures in Malaysia, the Philippines, Australia and Indonesia. They are loss-making because they are at start-up stage, with different timelines to profitability, he explained.
Dr Lee stressed that the group would take a long- term view and harness its cash reserves carefully in the face of greater competition in the media sector, and tap new opportunities to generate revenue.
‘The road ahead for SPH will not be easy,’ Dr Lee said in his first speech as SPH chairman. ‘New technology has changed media consumption patterns and opened up competitive distribution channels.’
But he added that SPH has strengths in human capital and financial resources, and would leverage on its experience in adjacent businesses to create new revenue streams.
SPH turned in a ‘commendable performance’ for the last financial year despite an uncertain economic climate, said Mr Cham.
Group revenue crossed the $1 billion mark for the seventh consecutive time at $1.25 billion, thanks to higher advertisement revenues, growth in rental income and continued progress in its exhibitions and online businesses.
Net profit attributable to SPH shareholders for the fiscal year ended Aug 31 was $389 million – a 22 per cent decline from the preceding fiscal year, which had benefited from a $154 million profit from the Sky@eleven condominium project.
StarHub – DMG
UEFA 2012 to Kick Off Cross Carriage Ruling
StarHub announced that it has obtained exclusive broadcast rights for the UEFA Euro 2012 football tournament, which will be jointly hosted by Poland and Ukraine from 8 June–12 July 2012. The rights fall under the government’s cross-carriage ruling that took effect from 1 Aug, which requires any content inked on an exclusive basis to be shared with other pay-TV operators.
OUR TAKE
Learning from the EPL days. We gather from media reports that the rights were awarded through a negotiated process, as opposed to conventional bidding, which probably also explains the relative cost discipline exercised by StarHub under the current cross-carriage regime. Management had previously stressed that economic sense would prevail in the subscription of exclusive content and that it would not be pursuing a loss leader product (foregoing the EPL rights to SingTel in 2009). Further details on the cross-carriage and pricing plans will be announced in due course.
Still keenly followed; a boost for sports content. Organized by the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Euro is a highly popular quadrennial football event that enjoys an almost cult following in Asia that is matched only by the popularity of the English Premier League (EPL) and World Cup. During the Euro 2008 championship, gross takings from the tournament across all media (TV rights, media sponsorship and ticketing) reached a whopping EUR1.3bn (20% or EUR280m from commercial rights alone), a 53% increase over that from Euro 2004. Euro 2008 broadcasts attracted on average 155m viewers globally per match (31 matches in total). We believe that management has taken into account various factors – such as the relatively high viewership ratings (possibly second only to the EPL), the boost to subscription and advertising revenue recorded during Euro 2008, and the value attached by sports subscribers to the Euro franchise – in procuring the exclusive rights for Euro 2012, after losing the EPL rights to SingTel in 2009.
Tapping into the fast expanding mio-TV base. We expect StarHub to make available the Euro 2012 matches across its pay-TV, mobile and broadband platforms in cementing its “hubbing” proposition, with price plans that are similar to Euro 2008. That said, the final subscription price to be levied would depend on commercial agreements entered into by the recipient/provider of the carriage with respect to carriage fees. StarHub is expected to ride on the new ruling to crosscarry content across SingTel’s mio-TV platform, allowing the former to tap on the latter’s strong pool of 335k subscribers, a sizeable proportion of which are former subscribers of its own sport package (prior to the lost of the EPL rights in 2009).
Minimal ARPU increment likely. For the Euro 2008 broadcast, StarHub offered a “Season Pass” for a one-off fee of SGD20/mth for sports group subscribers and SGD50/mth for non-sports group subscribers. We note that StarHub’s pay-TV revenue grew 5% q-o-q in 2QFY08, coinciding with the broadcast timeline, although this was offset by the 6% q-o-q expansion in cost of services line (where content cost is parked), which was likely driven by rights for Euro 2008. StarHub reported a 2k contraction in pay-TV subscribers vs the 23k added by SingTel in 3Q11.
Maintain NEUTRAL based on FV of SGD2.80. We make no changes to our earnings forecast for now and believe that higher programming costs arising from the Euro 2012 rights and renewal of other content would generally offset the incremental subscription and advertising revenue to be derived from one-off sporting events. While we are slightly positive on the exclusivity on the belief that rationality has prevailed in its procurement, which was coupled with the potential upside from the-cross carriage, we are still concerned over the longer term dilution in StarHub’s pay-TV franchise in view of the sticky content cost and the fact that SingTel is a formidable competitor with deep pockets.
StarHub – BT
StarHub’s Euro 2012 victory not a nailbiter: analysts
No real impact seen, in reducing SingTel’s subscriber base nor in raising StarHub’s
Even with StarHub’s exclusive rights to the UEFA Euro 2012 in the bag, not much will change the tug-of-war for subscribers between it and SingTel, analysts reckon.
‘Overall, we do not expect the latest development to have a huge impact on SingTel’s subscriber base nor will it aggressively increase StarHub’s subscriber base,’ said OCBC’s Carey Wong in a note yesterday.
As at end-September, StarHub had 542,000 residential pay-TV customers, while SingTel’s mio TV had 335,000 customers.
While StarHub has exclusive rights to air Euro 2012, Singapore’s relatively new cross-carriage law will make it compulsory for StarHub to offer the matches to mio TV viewers who ask for them, at the same price.
While football fans might have plenty to cheer when the tournament runs from early June to early July next year, analysts have greeted the news with a yawn.
‘The impact on StarHub’s earnings should be minimal in either direction,’ said DBS Group Research’s Sachin Mittal in a report yesterday.
CIMB Research analysts Simeon Koh and Kelvin Goh noted that StarHub’s subscriber base rose only 0.6 per cent quarter-on- quarter during the Euro 2008 quarter.
For Euro 2008, in which StarHub was an exclusive broadcaster – ‘exclusive’ in a much stricter sense of the word, pre-cross-carriage law – its sports package customers paid $10-20 to watch the matches, while those not subscribing to StarHub’s sports package paid $50. Rates for Euro 2012 will be announced only next year.
Just how much Euro 2012 is costing StarHub and what viewers will in turn have to pay is something that analysts are divided on, compounded by how the usual bidding process might have been replaced with a negotiated deal this time around.
CIMB’s Messrs Koh and Goh ‘are not overly excited given that the broadcast rights may be very costly; and this one-month event may not give StarHub sufficient firepower to claw long-term market share’, they said in the report.
DBS’s Mr Mittal, however, believes otherwise. ‘This is not the most popular piece of content, and there was an absence of bidding. As such, we assume that content cost should not be a big burden for Star- Hub. SingTel appears to have stayed away as they paid a huge price tag for English Premier League (EPL) rights,’ he said.
Even if cost isn’t an issue for StarHub, the same cannot be assumed for mio TV viewers. ‘While cross- carriage regulation may help mio TV subscribers to watch these matches this time around, they could end up paying more, in our view. Consumers can subscribe directly to StarHub (with or without the sports package) rather than going through SingTel’s mio TV to enjoy savings through bundling discounts,’ Mr Mittal added.
In 2010, SingTel wrested a three-year deal to air the Barclays Premier League (BPL) matches from StarHub in a triumph of bidding, but reportedly paid $300 million for it.
Even StarHub’s decision to go solo in gaining exclusive rights to Euro 2012 has given some analysts pause. OCBC’s Mr Wong said: ‘We are quite surprised by the move, as a joint bid – as in the case of the recent World Cup 2010 – would make more sense, both economically and logistically.’
StarHub’s counter closed 9 cents, or 3.1 per cent, lower at $2.82 yesterday, while SingTel’s fell 6 cents, or 1.9 per cent, to $3.06.
November 2011
Results Announcement
- 4 Nov 11 : STEng (Q311) – EPS 4.39ct (todate 12.31ct)
- 9 Nov 11 : StarHub (Q311) – EPS 4.42ct (todate 14.34ct) ; Div 5ct (todate 15ct)
- 10 Nov 11 (AM) : SingTel (Q212) – EPS 5.53ct (todate 11.29ct) ; Div 6.8ct
- 10 Nov 11 (AM) : MIIF (Q312) – No Div Payout as Semi-Annual Payout Policy
- 10 Nov 11 : SATS (Q212) – EPS 3.6ct (todate 7.5ct) ; Div 5ct
- 11 Nov 11 : SBSTransit (Q311) – EPS 3.45ct (todate 10.46ct)
- 14 Nov 11 : ComfortDelgro (Q311) – EPS 3.3ct (todate 8.57ct)
STI = 2702.46 (+14.36)
|
Stock |
Period |
EPS cts |
DPS cts |
Mkt |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|
SPH |
FY11 (Aug) |
24 |
24 |
$3.910 |
6.138% |
16.29 |
Interim 7ct ; Final 9ct + 8ct (Special) |
|
SingPost |
FY11 (Mar) |
8.369 |
6.25 |
$0.980 |
6.378% |
11.71 |
Q1, Q2, Q3 1.25ct ; Q4 2.5ct |
|
STI ETF |
Jun-11 |
— |
4.5 |
$2.760 |
3.261% |
— |
Jun11 4.5ct ; Dec10 3.5ct |
|
SATS |
FY11 (Mar) |
17.4 |
17 |
$2.170 |
7.834% |
12.47 |
Final 6ct + Special 6ct ; Interim 5ct |
|
ST Engg |
FY10 (Dec) |
16.21 |
14.55 |
$2.670 |
5.449% |
16.47 |
Final 4ct + 7.55ct (Special) ; Interim 3ct |
Transport
|
Stock |
Period |
EPS cts |
DPS cts |
Mkt |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|
SBSTransit |
FY10 (Dec) |
17.63 |
8.80 |
$1.710 |
5.146% |
9.70 |
Interim 4.5ct ; Final 4.3ct |
|
ComfortDelGro |
FY10 (Dec) |
10.95 |
5.50 |
$1.400 |
3.929% |
12.79 |
Interim 2.7ct ; Final 2.8ct |
|
SMRT |
FY11 (Mar) |
10.6 |
8.5 |
$1.780 |
4.775% |
16.79 |
Interim 1.75ct ; Final 6.75ct |
TELCO
|
Stock |
Period |
EPS cts |
DPS cts |
Mkt |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|
SingTel |
FY11 (Mar) |
24.02 |
25.8 |
$3.070 |
8.795% |
12.78 |
Interim 6.8ct ; Final 9ct + Special 10ct |
|
M1 |
FY10 (Dec) |
17.5 |
17.5 |
$2.420 |
7.231% |
13.83 |
Interim 6.3ct ; Final 7.7ct + Special 3.5ct |
|
StarHub |
FY10 (Dec) |
15.34 |
20 |
$2.830 |
7.067% |
18.45 |
Q1 5ct ; Q2 5ct ; Q3 5ct ; Q4 5ct |
Funds / Infrastructure
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS cts |
Mkt |
Yield |
NAV |
Div Breakdown |
|
SPAus |
1H – Sep11 |
A4.0 (Gross) |
$1.220 |
8.491% |
A$0.89 |
2H11 A4.0ct ; 1H11 A4.0ct |
|
MIIF |
1H – Jun11 |
2.75 |
$0.545 |
10.092% |
$0.81 |
1H11 2.75ct ; 2H10 1.5ct |
* SPAus DPU in A$. Yield is Calculated Using Latest Exchange Rate (1.2969) fm Yahoo
NOTES :
- Mkt Price is as on 30-Nov-11
- SATSvcs : Q212 (Sep11) – Interim 5ct
- SingTel : 1H12 (Sep11) – Interim 6.8ct
- StarHub : Q311 (Sep) – 5ct ; Q211 (Jun) – 5ct ; Q111 (Mar) – 5ct
- SMRT : Q212 (Sep11) – Interim 1.75ct
- SingPost : Q212 (Sep11) – 1.25ct ; Q112 (Jun11) – 1.25ct
- SPH : 2H11 (Aug) – 9ct (Final) + 8ct (Special) ; 1H11 (Feb) – 7ct
- ComfortDelgro : Q211 (Jun) – 2.7ct
- SBSTransit : Q211 (Jun) – 3.1ct
- MIIF : 1H11 (Jun) – 2.75ct ; 2H10 (Dec) – 1.5ct
- ST Engg : 1H11 (Jun) – 3ct
- M1 : 1H11 (Jun) – Interim 6.6ct
- SPAus : 2H11 (Mar11) – A4ct (before tax) / A3.7721ct (after tax) ; 1H11 (Sep10) – A4ct (before tax) / A3.7772ct (after tax)
- StarHub : FY11 Div Guidance – 5ct/Q