Author: tfwee
M1 – BT
Will M1 put on a new game face?
TELCO counters are often seen as defensive plays during turbulent times and no other local telco epitomises this quality in its modus operandi more than M1. However, with the impending arrival of a new chief, will M1 finally change tack and go on the offensive, or will it continue to play nice and passively defend its turf?
Last Friday, M1’s chief executive Neil Montefiore announced his surprising decision to step down next month. Chief financial officer Karen Kooi will take the helm in the interim while the company hunts for a new head honcho.
Unlike Mr Montefiore’s 12-year stint, M1’s incoming chief is in for a much rougher ride. When it was formed in 1994, M1 was the only alternative to incumbent Singapore Telecommunications in a market long deprived of options.
Coupled with a relatively untapped base for radio paging and cellular services back then, M1 cruised to a decade of rapid subscriber growth and established a comfortable beachhead alongside SingTel and StarHub.
However, with sweeping changes being made to the competitive landscape in the last 12 months, M1 is showing early signs that it could be buckling under the pressure.
On the one hand, the operator is experiencing higher churn rates compared to its two rivals in the era of ‘true mobile number portability’.
More M1 customers have defected to SingTel and StarHub now that they are able to transfer their mobile numbers from one telco to another.
An average of 7,000 cellular subscribers port their mobile numbers every month, representing around 0.1 per cent of Singapore’s 6.27-million-strong cellphone user population. The churn rate in itself is not significant but the underlying fact that more subscribers are choosing to leave M1 is a cause for concern.
What is more alarming, however, is the ability of M1’s competitors to draw new subscribers even with the mobile market edging towards saturation point. In the third quarter of 2008, SingTel gained 45,000 new post-paid customers while StarHub recorded a tally of 17,000. In contrast, M1 added only 4,000 new subscribers in the period.
The results in the fourth quarter should tell a similar tale. SingTel will no doubt get a lift from its exclusive tie-up with Apple for the iPhone. StarHub’s longstanding strategy of ‘hubbing’ or offering discounts for multiple services is expected to retain its allure, especially when consumers are now careful with their spending.
Both companies are even dangling freebies from notebooks to desktop computers alongside new broadband contracts, paving the way for them to up-sell additional services such as cellular subscriptions in future.
Without a viable second business, M1 cannot afford to do the same. At a time when providing mobile services has become somewhat of a lowest common denominator, a new laptop or a sizeable monthly discount could well be the deciding factor between one operator and another.
With the impending change-of-guard, a strategic review of M1’s existing business will be among the top items on the agenda. One key question that will face the new chief is how M1 will eke out growth when competitors seem to have the upper hand.
Unlike its rivals, M1 has always chosen to play nice under the stewardship of Mr Montefiore. When StarHub entered the market as an Internet service provider in 1999, it went on the offensive and offered free unlimited dial-up Internet packages, effectively sealing the fates of market leaders Pacific Internet and SingNet. It followed this up by with free incoming calls and per-second billing on the mobile front.
Diversification
SingTel also threw down the gauntlet locally by hogging the iPhone distributorship and by going after the next generation of mobile users with student plans offering free campus calls and unlimited text messages.
M1 will have to come up with something more impactful to shift the market dynamics back in its favour.
Diversification, both from a product or geographical perspective, is the other key decision that has to be made by the new M1 CEO.
With Singapore’s mobile penetration already at a sky-high rate of 130 per cent, should the company diversify into broadband-related ventures when Singapore’s new high-speed fibre-optic network becomes operational in 2012?
The danger here is that the Republic’s small Internet user base may not be able to support the vibrant broadband landscape that local authorities have envisioned with the dawn of the new network.
Overseas expansion could be another consideration for M1 with mobile services just starting to take off in emerging regional markets such as Vietnam and Cambodia. With its limited capital, partnerships with foreign players or even consolidation with another local telco could help this cause.
While M1’s future direction will undoubtedly hinge on its new skipper, one thing is for certain: the company cannot afford to stand still amid the current sea change. Against cutthroat competition, sometimes the best defence for a company is a good offence.
STEng – DBS
Holding Fort
We upgrade ST Engineering to BUY with a target price of S$2.80. Amidst the worsening global economic outlook, STE has sustained its reputation of being a defensive counter, with a slew of new contract wins in recent months across different segments. In spite of possible slowdowns in its Aerospace and Marine segments, we are positive on the stock given 1) its ability to boost growth through M&A, 2) a relatively secure dividend yield of 7%, 3) record orderbook of
S$10b and 4) cash and cash equivalents of S$1b.
Robust orderbook of S$10b will drive revenues.
Contract wins have been stable across the Group’s subsidiaries in recent months, demonstrating the defensive nature of the Group’s diversified earnings stream. It is also in line with our expectation that public spending in defence, transport, and infrastructure projects will mainly drive revenue growth over the next two years.
US operations may recover faster than expected.
Even though major US airlines have pared capacity in FY08, jet fuel prices have corrected significantly and airline industry losses, going forward, will be lower than previously expected. Hence, the demand for 3rd-party MRO work may recover earlier than projected.
Upgrade to BUY, attractive dividend yield of 7%.
The group is focused on enhancing value for shareholders and STE has been paying out 100% of its earnings as dividends since 2002. As a result, the Group has been able to generate very high ROEs in the range of 30%, while still retaining cash and cash equivalents of approximately S$1b at the end of 3Q08. We believe this strong cash holding will present potential growth upside – in the form of good acquisitions at distressed valuations.
SingPost – OCBC
In Post We Trust
Singapore’s established postal services operator. Singapore Post (SingPost) is the designated Public Postal Licensee for Singapore. It provides domestic and international postal services, and is also a logistics provider in the domestic market with global service offerings to more than 220 territories/countries. Leveraging on its retail distribution network, SingPost also provides agency and financial services. In 1H09, the group achieved a 4.3% YoY rise in revenue to S$241.6m but incurred a 1.5% fall in net profit to S$76.9m. Excluding one-off items, underlying net profit was higher by 11.5% at S$77.7m.
Should remain dominant despite liberalisation. Despite the liberalisation of the basic mail services market in Apr 07, SingPost is still in a strong position to remain as the dominant postal services operator. Only it can hold the masterdoor keys to letterboxes provided by property owners and developers, including those in HDB estates, as dictated by the Info-communications Development Authority (IDA). With other advantages like an established distribution network, significant free cash flow, a monopoly over stamp issues and an entrenched brand name, we believe that the liberalisation should have limited impact on SingPost.
Defensiveness amid uncertainty. SingPost has stable operating and free cash flows given the nature of its business. It has also been increasing its dividend per share since its IPO in 2003 to S$0.0625 in FY08. With the uncertainty in today’s stock markets, its earnings are omparatively defensive. Although mail volume growth may be affected by e-substitution and the slowing economy, SingPost has undertaken proactive measures, as evidenced from its launched initiatives and diversification of services.
Initiate with BUY. The defensive nature of SingPost’s business and its dominant market position renders it an attractive investment. Its proactive measures demonstrate its resolution to safeguard its profits, making it an even more compelling stock. Moreover, with a long list of properties under its name, SingPost may be able to unlock asset value when the time is ripe. We initiate SingPost with a BUY recommendation and S$0.93 fair value, derived from the free cash flow to equity approach (cost of equity 8.8%, terminal growth 2%). SingPost has a dividend policy of minimum S$0.05 per share a year, implying at least a 6.3% yield. Assuming SingPost continues its S$0.0625 dividend per share in FY09, this would imply a 7.9% yield, which is attractive given its defensiveness.
Yield Stocks – BT
Lower dividends on the cards as earnings wither
But blue chip companies likely to maintain payout ratios
Investors could receive lower dividend payouts in absolute dollar terms this year as corporate earnings wither under the heat of the recession.
Still, investors can take heart that yields will still remain at attractively high levels, given the low valuations and the fact that most companies are not planning to cut their dividend payout ratios yet.
Not all companies have fixed their dividend policies but the blue chip firms that BT spoke to say they are likely to maintain the status quo.
‘We will continue to reward our shareholders with dividends as long as free cashflow is not required for acquisitions and strategic investments,’ said a ST Engineering spokesperson. The group paid out 100 per cent of its net earnings as dividends for the fifth year during fiscal 2007.
Keppel Corp spokesperson told BT that the group aims to distribute around 50-60 per cent of its full year Patmi (profit after tax and minority interest) annually as dividends to shareholders.
Agricultural commodities supplier Olam International has a dividend payout policy of 25 per cent of NPAT (net profit after tax) and says it does not expect any significant changes to its policy as it expects to meet its earnings target for fiscal 2009.
‘Given that our business fundamentals are quite strong and our belief that agricultural commodity sector remains attractive due to structural reasons, we expect to deliver long-term shareholder value,’ said an Olam spokesperson.
Analysts note that thanks to their strong cash positions, most blue chips still have the staying power to stick to their dividend payout policies.
‘The good dividend-paying sectors have always been the banks, the offshore marine sector and the telcos and in these sectors, I think the ability to pay is still there,’ CIMB-GK research head Kenneth Ng said.
He noted that earnings of banks may fall this year, but not to the extent that it would jeopardise dividend payouts. In fact, during the Asian financial crisis, the banks maintained their dividends, he recalled.
OCBC head of corporate communications Koh Ching Ching told BT that the bank maintains a minimum dividend payout of 45 per cent of its core earnings. For fiscal 2007, OCBC paid out 28 cents per share or 46 per cent of its core earnings as dividends.
While companies that will maintain their payout ratios stand to earn kudos, the harsh operating climate has prompted the market to already price in the prospect of lower dividends on the back of weaker earnings expectations.
JPMorgan analyst Christopher Gee noted that valuation models imply that Singapore stock dividends will drop 20 per cent in the next year or fall by 2.2 per cent per annum over the next 10 years.
He believes stocks in the financial sector – both banks and real estate stocks and notably the S-Reits – are the most likely to lower their dividend ratios due to weaker earnings or equity dilution from refinancing exercises.
‘Stocks in cyclical sectors with fixed payout ratios are also likely to see reduced dividends, with SIA and the commodity-related names the most likely to reduce dividend payouts in our view,’ Mr Gee said in a recent report.
Some companies may choose to reduce their dividend payouts to conserve cash in a difficult year or seek M&A opportunities, Mr Ng of CIMB-GK added. This is especially so given that many companies’ share prices are beaten down, and can still offer a high yield despite a lower dividend payout.
While recent concerns about debt refinancing and recapitalisation needs have sent prices of S-Reits south, some S-Reit managers told BT they are keeping to a 100 per cent distribution payout, above the 90 per cent minimum required under regulatory guidelines. Some Reits have also secured their refinancing needs for this year.
‘For 2009, Parkway Life Reit intends to continue to maintain its distribution payout at 100 per cent,’ said Yong Yean Chau, acting CEO and CFO of Parkway Life Reit.
He added that Parkway Life Reit has secured all its financing needs by replacing short-term credit facilities with longer-term facilities and has locked in long-term master leases for its properties.
Suntec Reit chief executive Yeo See Kiat said the Reit’s next refinancing will not be due before December 2009 and he does not expect to see a major fluctuation in distribution payout.
Analysts suggest that some companies may vary their payout ratios to maintain their absolute dividend sums.
JPMorgan’s Mr Gee is expecting payout ratios of Singapore companies to rise to 58 per cent in fiscal 2009, up from an average payout ratio of 53 per cent between 2000 and 2007. This will translate to a yield of 6.59 per cent.
For fiscal 2008, which has just ended, StarHub has committed to paying an absolute dividend sum of 18 cents per share, up from 16 cents in fiscal 2007, while SingTel and Mobile- One said they might review their payout ratios.
‘Unlike other companies, we do not have a payout ratio for our dividend – it has always been on absolute level,’ a StarHub spokeswoman told BT. ‘We are a free cashflow-focused company. We don’t believe in paying dividends based out of our earnings.’
A Singapore Exchange (SGX) spokesperson said the company aims to pay dividends no less than either 80 per cent of the annual NPAT or 14 cents per share, whichever is higher. It paid total dividends of 38 cents per share for the fiscal year ended June 30.
Investors may also find some comfort in the projections by Morgan Stanley analysts – that dividend cuts will be much smaller than earnings declines. This was what happened during the Asian financial crisis of 1997/98, when Asia-Pacific (ex-Japan) EPS fell 73 per cent peak-to-trough, but dividends per share declined by just 20 per cent.
The concerns notwithstanding, these analysts suggest that for long term investors, a wide gap between dividend yields and bond yields should serve as a ‘strong buy’ signal for dividend-yielding stocks.
December 2008
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPH |
FY087 : Aug |
27.0 |
S$3.11 |
8.682% |
11.52 |
Interim 8ct ; Final 9ct + 10ct (Special) |
|
SingPost |
FY08 : Mar |
6.25 |
S$0.795 |
7.862% |
10.24 |
Q1 1.25ct ; Q2 1.25ct ; Q3 1.25ct ; Q4 2.5ct |
|
Sing Food |
FY07 : Dec |
5.0 |
S$0.89 |
5.618% |
14.59 |
Interim 1.8ct ; Final 3.2ct |
|
STEng |
FY07 : Dec |
16.88 |
S$2.37 |
7.122% |
13.98 |
Final 4ct + 10.88ct (Special) ; Interim 2ct |
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBSTransit |
FY07 : Dec |
17.25 |
S$1.70 |
10.147% |
10.38 |
Interim 6ct ; Special 8ct ; Final 3.25ct |
|
ComfortDelgro |
FY07 : Dec |
10.15 |
S$1.45 |
7.000% |
13.51 |
Interim 3.125ct + Special 3.375 ; Final 3ct + Special 1.5ct |
|
SMRT |
FY08 : Mar |
7.75 |
S$1.65 |
4.697% |
16.67 |
Interim 1.75ct ; Final 6.0ct |
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
PE |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SingTel |
FY08 : Mar |
12.5 |
S$2.55 |
4.902% |
10.24 |
Interim 5.6ct ; Final 6.9ct |
|
M1 |
FY07 : Dec |
15.4 |
S$1.48 |
10.405% |
8.00 |
Interim 2.5ct + 4.6ct (Capital Reduction) ; Final 8.3ct |
|
StarHub |
FY07 : Dec |
16.0 |
S$1.94 |
8.247% |
10.36 |
Q1 3.5ct ; Q2 4.0ct ; Q3 4.0ct ; Q4 4.5ct |
|
Stock |
Period |
DPS ct |
Price |
Yield |
NAV |
Div Breakdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPAus |
1H : Sep-08 |
A5.7431 |
S$0.94 |
12.159% |
A$1.00 (NTA) |
1H A5.7431ct |
|
MIIF |
1H : Jun-08 |
4.25 |
S$0.295 |
28.814% |
$1.14 |
1H 4.25ct |
|
MacCookPSF |
Q2 : Dec-08 |
A1.0 (Gross) |
S$0.16 |
24.960% |
A$0.655 (NTA) |
Q209 A1.0ct ; Q109 A1.75ct |
* SPAus and MacCookPSF DPU in A$. Yield is Calculated Using Latest Exchange Rate (0.9951) fm Yahoo
NOTES :
- Mkt Price is as on 31-Dec-08
- MacCookPSF : Q209 (Dec08) – A1.0ct (Gross ie. before with-holding tax) / Quarter ; Source : SGX
- SPAus : 1H09 (Sep08) – A5.927ct (before tax) / A5.7431ct (after tax)
- SingTel : Q209 (Sep08) – Interim 5.6ct
- StarHub : Q308 (Sep) – 4.5ct ; Q208 (Jun) – 4.5ct ; Q108 (Mar) – 4.5ct
- SMRT : Q209 (Sep08) – Interim 1.75ct
- SingPost : Q209 (Sep08) – 1.25ct ; Q109 (Jun08) – 1.25ct
- SPH : 2H08 (Aug) – 9ct + 10ct (Special) ; 1H08 (Feb) – 8ct
- ComfortDelgro : Q208 (Jun) – 2.6ct
- SBSTransit : Q208 (Jun) – 3ct
- MIIF : 1H08 (Jun) – 4.25ct
- ST Engg : Q208 (Jun) – 3ct
- Sing Food : Q208 (Jun) – 1.8ct
- M1 : 1H08 (Jun) – Interim 6.2ct
- MacCookPSF : Q408 (Jun08) A2.31ct @ 1.3092 ; Q308 (Mar08) A2.31ct @ 1.2525 ; Q208 (Dec07) A2.31ct @ 1.2485 ; Q108 (Sep07) – A2.625ct (Gross) / A2.31ct (After With-hldg Tax)
